United States v. Stanley

109 U.S. 3 Supreme Court 1883
isittrue that slavery cannot exist without law,ifabolishingslaveryhasnotabolishedtheinequalities andbadges of slavery whichwereimposed bylaw, or bycustom,andno doubtprevailed
BackNext
Share

This decision combined five cases in which a Black person was denied the same accommodations as a White person, in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1875. The Act guaranteed full and equal enjoyment of all facilities offered to the public, even if those facilities were privately run.

In this decision, the Supreme Court ruled the Act unconstitutional with the majority ruling that the federal government could not intervene in discriminatory actions among private parties.

In the one dissenting opinion, Justice Harlan argued against the narrow interpretation of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments and warned of the implications for reversing any emancipatory progress following the Civil War. Predictably, the ruling paved the way for legal racial segregation and discrimination until it was overturned in Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., 392 U.S. 409 (1968).

Back to top